Liverpool Builds Bright Future
Rising private sector confidence in Liverpool’s ability to
become a prosperous, competitive city-region is helping to
transform its retail and commercial office core, sparking a
building boom without parallel in the last half century.
Cranes crowd the skyline as developers, construction companies,
fund managers and public agencies step up the £2.5 billion physical
and economic regeneration of the waterfront and central business
and shopping districts.
Take-up levels in the city centre office market in 2005 reached
a record high of nearly 500,000 sq ft (46,451 sq m), an increasing
proportion of which is new-build. Rentals have also risen from £14
to £20 per sq ft over the past five years and investor demand has
driven capital growth faster than any other provincial city.
“On the basis of headline rents and yields, the capital value of
new office space has doubled in that period,” enthuses Jim Gill,
Chief Executive of Liverpool Vision, the Urban Regeneration Company
(URC) charged with coordinating the city centre’s recovery.
Property consultants GVA Grimley report that Liverpool has
outstripped other UK cities in rental growth and expects 1.15
million sq ft(106,838 sq m) of new or refurbished space to come to
market in the next four years with demand matching supply.
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
Much of the restored confidence, suggests Gill, stems from
Liverpool’s Vision’s broader planning strategy for the central
business district. “Five years ago Liverpool was just not on the
investment radar for national developers or institutional
investors. Now they are taking advantage of the opportunities being
offered.”
Liverpool Vision was the first URC to be established by the
government in 1999 in its quest for strategic leadership and bette
rintegration of resources to bring about an urban renaissance. The
company’s public sector funding partners are Liverpool City
Council, the Northwest Regional Development Agency (NWDA) and
English Partnerships. The NWDA contribution to Vision’s three-year
rolling business plan will peak at £31 million in the current
financial year.
Commercial development is now much less dependent on public gap
funding. Grosvenor Estates forged ahead with its £920 million
Liverpool One retail and associated leisure and residential
development without any public funding. The 1.6 million sq ft
(148,644 sq m) scheme, which is due to open in Spring 2008,will
double the city’s existing retail area. Grosvenor’s willingness to
invest, says Gill, has been influenced by the URC’s broader plan
for the city centre and the commitment of Vision’s partners to
seeing the regeneration plan through to completion. “Grosvenor are
long-terms investors – they can see Liverpool has a long-term
future.”
Gill and his team are particularly pleased with the progress
being made to reshape the city’s commercial district, again with
diminishing pump-prime funding from public sector partners.
In 2001 Liverpool Vision devised a three phase strategy to
kick-start speculative office development, then to create a new
expanded commercial district in the area bounded by Old Hall Street
and Pall Mall, to the north of the city’s traditional commercial
area. Low rental levels had provided little or no incentive to
invest in speculative schemes and the existing stock gave only
limited opportunities to revitalise the market.
Support was pledged for three stand-alone schemes totalling
425,000 sq ft (39,483 sq m);the Beetham development at 101 Old Hall
Street (let to Unisys and the Passport Office), Shepborough
Developments’ City Square project (let to the Department of
Constitutional Affairs) and Rumford Investments’ Unity scheme in
Chapel Street, which announced its first letting to Ernst &
Young in December 2006.
Occupier response has been such that the grant aid for the first
two schemes has either be repaid in full or was never taken up. The
Unity development, which required £10 million of public funding (£5
million from the NWDA), largely because of adverse ground
conditions, was completed in November 2006.
Gill is bullish about the market’s performance. “We have not
seen this level of commercial development in Liverpool for over50
years. There is a pent-up demand from professional firms wanting to
consolidate in quality space and boost their growth potential.”
VIABLE FUTURE
The main occupiers, developers and investors in the new
commercial district are demonstrating their commitment to the area
by creating the Liverpool Commercial District Partnership. Working
with Liverpool Vision and other public agencies, the partnership
will work on improving the management and marketing of the
area.
“They are taking responsibility for the future well-being of the
area because they believe it has a viable future – five years ago
that would never have happened,” explains Gill. Rising residential
values are another rmeasure of how far the city has progressed. All
the £150 million funding for the Arena and Convention Centre at
Kings Waterfront is coming from the public sector but a third o
rmore of that is expected to be recouped from residential,
commercial and leisure development of the rest of the site.
The first phase residential development, a joint venture scheme
by David McLean and City Lofts is due on site in March. Hotel
development for Jury’s Inn and Stalybridge Suites will be completed
by Spring 2008.
Gill argues that the regeneration of the city centre waterfront,
and the retail and commercial expansion are merely helping
Liverpool to catch up with los opportunity brought about by 40
years of economic stagnation.
Liverpool Vision will shape more of its future programme, he
says, around the fundamentals of wealth and job creation with the
likely focus shifting towards the areas around the two
universities, Hope Street and the fast developing Baltic
‘independent’ district.
Together with other Liverpool agencies – Liverpool Land
Development Company and Business Liverpool – Liverpool Vision is
working with the City Council on proposals for a new, single
economic regeneration company yto drive the pace of change in the
city even faster. It is expected to be operational by April
2008.
“The debate now is how we rack up performance, how we structure
an organisation to meet these challenges. Each o fthe partners is
signed up for change and we will have a much clearer idea of where
we are going by the end of the financial year.”